🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.